|
Shopgirl:
The Lifestyles of the Rich and Reluctant
Claire Danes, Steve Martin, Jason Schwartzman
Review
by Breanne Boland
November 3, 2005 Issue
The shop girl
of the title is Mirabelle Buttersfield, played by Claire Danes,
a Vermont girl who moved to Los Angeles to get her life started,
but instead winds up in the no-man’s-land of the glove counter
of Saks Fifth Avenue. Jeremy, played by Jason Schwartzman, is
an amplifier salesman and would-be font designer who very ineptly
picks up Mirabelle in a Laundromat. Ray Porter, played by Steve
Martin, who also wrote the novella upon which this film is based,
is a wealthy older man who expertly picks up Mirabelle while she’s
at work. Mirabelle, despite not being your traditional LA woman
(as the movie points out again, and again, and again), easily
falls for the suave Ray, but despite mutual appreciation, the
relationship doesn’t progress quite as either of them would
like.
Danes and
Martin are both a touch too reserved to really bring this story
to life. Their reticence is appropriate for the people they play,
but for a film with only three main characters, to have two of
them be so aloof makes getting into the story difficult at times.
Still, it is nice to see the clever, sly Martin in something more
sophisticated and intelligent, instead of his recent screaming,
squirming parts in things like the Cheaper by the Dozen movies.
The best parts, however, are when Schwartzman is on screen. His
exuberance and his portrayal of his character’s strange
evolution toward becoming a whole person are delicious to watch,
walking the fine line between hilarious and absolutely believable.
In film school, they tell aspiring screenwriters that needing
a voiceover means you haven’t succeeded in communicating
what is necessary through the dialogue and action. It would’ve
been hard to adapt Shopgirl without one, as the narration in the
book outlined most of the characters’ thoughts, being as
prone to inaction as they are. However, the voiceover of this
film is weirdly uneven, popping up only occasionally and with
enough distance between appearances that you almost forget there
was ever a narrator at all. Stranger still is that Martin does
it himself, making it unclear whether the voice is supposed to
be that of his character or of some omniscient storyteller.
Generally,
I don’t notice music in films. When the composer does his
or her job, the music blends in with the scene, adding depth without
drawing attention to it. Alas, this was not the case with Shopgirl.
The music was all inappropriately soaring strings, melodramatic
stuff more suited to the film adaptation of Her Majestic Passion,
or some equally torrid story involving ripped bodices and alabaster
bosoms. Shopgirl is fairly low-key, so far as romance goes. That’s
what’s good about it— there is nothing overwrought—only
people figuring themselves out among the other characters, not
making a big, ill-placed fuss over what happens. Apparently no
one told the composer. Pity.
Despite the
positive parts, Shopgirl was ultimately a disappointment. It’s
disappointing as an adaptation of a wonderful novella, as well
as a film standing on its own. Had it come out in the summer,
it could have been a good choice for a night at the theater, seeming
more intelligent for the comparison to bigger, louder summer movies.
However, as we are in fall, and the more serious, Oscar-seeking
films are coming out, seeing Shopgirl instead of one of the other
wonderful possibilities in theaters right now would be an unfortunate
use of two hours.
Bottom line:
Don’t take my word for it—read the book.
More movie reviews
More
from Breanne Boland
(Top)
|
|
|
In Zorro
Sequel, Sword Is Mightier Than Script
Antonio Banderas, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Rufus
Sewell, Adrian Alonso
Review by Chris Manson
November 3,
2005 Issue
The swashbuckling
hero Zorro is almost as old as cinema itself, going all the way
back to Douglas Fairbanks and the silent days. Tyrone Power got
off some good swordplay in Rouben Mamoulian’s The Mark of
Zorro in 1940, perhaps the quintessential Zorro film. Disney versions
followed, a television series, and George Hamilton’s 1981
farce Zorro, the Gay Blade. In 1998, director Martin Campbell struck
box office gold with The Mask of Zorro, solid entertainment and
a welcome departure from noisy special effects driven piffle like
Armageddon.
Seven years
later, here’s the follow-up, The Legend of Zorro. I don’t
actually remember that much about the first film, except that Anthony
Hopkins was in it. I remember him training young thief Antonio Banderas
to fill his Zorro, but cannot recall if the Hopkins character died
or simply wandered off into the sunset. Hopkins is absent this time,
with not even so much as a lousy Obi-Wan Kenobi cameo. Surprising
since the movie lifts so many bits from other popular movie franchises.
There’s the old how-can-you-not-know-it’s-him? masquerade
that worked so well for Superman and his successors. Elements of
espionage flicks and screwball comedies work their way into the
proceedings, too.
And there’s
domestic squabbling between Zorro and his lovely wife Elena, once
again portrayed by Academy Award winner Catherine Zeta-Jones. Elena
demands that her husband give up the Z-man gig, because he hardly
knows his son for starters. The split enables the plot wheels to
get rolling, but I hope a similar conceit does not work its way
into Spider-Man 3.
Campbell is
an adequate storyteller, having honed his chops with the James Bond
franchise. A new director might have brought a little more depth
to the series, but Campbell earns points—and a good amount
of “Yeah, right!” exclamations from the audience—for
his impressive set pieces, highlighted by a climactic fight atop
a speeding steam-powered locomotive. The script, by Roberto Orci
and Alex Kurtzman, has something to do with a secret society determined
to destroy the United States—with the nation clearly on the
verge of civil war, you might wonder why the villains didn’t
just wait it out.
Zeta-Jones appears
to be slumming at first, until she meets up with two mysterious
characters and gets to kick a little ass. That’s enough to
get Quentin Tarantino whooping and hollering in the third row and
me, too. Banderas looks a little silly in the Zorro costume—for
some reason, he reminds me of guitar-shilling infomercial star Esteban.
But he displays the right amount of self-deprecating humor to balance
the unbelievable heroics.
Banderas appears
comfortable in Zorro’s shoes, while Zeta-Jones manages to
rise above more than one inane situation. Rufus Sewell is effective
as Elena’s would-be suitor, and Nick Chinlund is all snarl
and wooden teeth as the main villain’s enforcer. But it is
Adrian Alfonso as Joaquin, son of Zorro, who rises well above the
expected kiddie actor cliches—he is a resourceful youngster
who disrupts a classroom with chip off the old block showing off.
The kid is smart, too, even if he doesn’t realize that Dad
and the “peasant masquerading as folk hero” are the
same guy.
The plot is
rubbish, but isn’t it nice that we have a Latin-American hero?
And here is a movie that might very well spark some interest in
U.S. history among young viewers. All this, and a nice message about
the family fighting together staying together. I could do without
the big explosions, but the Bond-influenced dazzlers work most of
the time. I also admire the chutzpah of the opening sequence, a
free-for-all that works in a rousing horse-and-buggy chase, one
of the pursuers suffering a ball-crushing worthy of old Benny Hill
skits, and a just-clocked thug spitting out a mouthful of teeth.
Similar sequences
are effective, even when they push the credibility meter way into
the red. The only clinker to speak of is an impossible escape from
a fiery farmhouse with a baby in tow. I just wish Zorro would use
his smarts a little more. Turns out the horse is the most sensible
character in the movie, even when he’s swigging a bottle of
tequila or puffing on a pipe.
Bottom Line:
Trifling but entertaining action fare.
More
movie reviews
(Top) |