March
8, 2007 Issue
There is something
very out of whack in the world when the likes of Anna Nicole Smith
(hereinafter to be known as ANS) and Britney Spears (hereafter to
be known as BS) continue to dominate the headlines in the midst
of staggering domestic problems. What is this national obsession
with celebrity — minor celebrity at that?
After all, ANS is famous
only for her outsized “assets,” empty head and the ability
to con a rich old man with one foot in the grave and the other on
a banana peel to marry her. BS, on the other hand, is almost an
American tragedy. Just a few short years ago she was the most famous
virgin in the United States, an up and coming singer and the idol
of millions of pre-teens. She frolicked and shopped on the Emerald
Coast with Justin Timberlake.
Fast forward to a few
years of too much money, no education and parents following the
money, and you have what you have: A bewildered girl with an underdeveloped
brain addled by alcohol and who knows what else, smoking a cig,
shaving her head and having two babies in 18 months. Refer to that
lack of education and choosing a mate notable for his ability to
produce offspring, to understand why two babies in such a short
time.
Timberlake, who likewise
missed out on much of an education due to his membership and touring
schedule with ‘N Sync, has fared much better — in the
spotlight for more positive reasons.
I read somewhere recently
that most young kids coming up these days have fame as a goal. Pardon
me while I show my age, but what the hell does that say about all
the so-called family values we are always being beaten about the
head with?
In my youth, most kids
said they wanted to be doctors, nurses, fire fighters, soldiers,
and police officers. In other words, professions that affected the
world in a positive way by helping or protecting others. Professions
that said, “I care and I can make a difference.”
Even journalists (the
real kind, not the TV kind) don’t do it for the money. They
do it to keep people informed. In journalism school I would never
have envisioned a world with pseudo news shows such as Access Hollywood.
Thank God I never thought of Fox News either, but that’s another
column.
I suspect some of the
attention focused on minor things is a result of multiple 24-hour
channels tasked with keeping the public up to date. I maintain this
could be done without ever once resorting to the sordid details
of ANS or BS. Have these “news” producers never heard
of in-depth coverage?
Legitimate news stories
are virtually limitless, especially with the resources these stations
have to investigate. The layers and layers of legislation we don’t
fully understand could be peeled back and exposed, so as voters
we have some idea of what our elected leaders are taking us in.
Had there been better investigative newsgathering before the invasion
of Iraq, we might not be there.
Throw in some feel good
feature stories and you got a network. There are lots of people
doing good things in large and small ways. Just last week, 60 Minutes
profiled this guy who made obscene amounts of money from The Simpsons,
and now spends millions rescuing dogs and training them as service
dogs for deaf and blind people, He saves the life of a dog, employs
people to train and care for the dogs on six acres of land in Malibu,
then gives the dog with special skills to someone who needs help.
How lovely.
To quote from a terrific
movie called The American President, “We have serious problems
in this county and we need serious people to solve them.”
We do not need to know how many people are claiming to be the father
of the baby of ANS or a day-to-day accounting of BS in rehab.
Incidentally, it’s
going to take more than 30 days at a revolving door, fashionable,
Evian-water-drinking, and maid service rehabilitation center to
cure what is wrong with BS. Clearly BS doesn’t want to do
it in private, but we don’t have to aid and abet her deconstruction
with our frenzied interest either. In five years, nobody will remember
her name anyway..
More
from Leah |