| December
15, 2005 Issue This
train of thought all started innocently enough. A few weeks back
I had occasion to attend a public meeting. I haven’t been
to one for quite a while, so I forgot about a few things.
First of all, one of
the assembled county government officials is called upon to offer
up a prayer. God knows our county leaders need all the help they
can get, divine or otherwise, so no harm no foul. What surprised
me about the prayer was the specific nature of it. While the prayer
asked for guidance in reaching the right decisions, it was asked
for in Jesus’ name. My jaw dropped.
I looked around the room
and saw a person who probably prays to Buddha, and others for whom
the Bible undoubtedly stops at the end of the Old Testament. I asked
myself, and the person next to me, how it could be that a public
official would be so specific in a public prayer? No answer was
forthcoming, so I’m forced to conclude the person offering
the prayer just assumed everyone in the room prayed as he did, which
is a presumption that should never be made, especially by a public
official.
Let me preface this by
saying I’m not one of those people for whom political correctness
is a way of life. Politically correct terms make language awkward
and I’m all about clear communication. A person is chairman
of a committee, even if the chairman is a woman. Get over yourself.
I see no problem with
offering up a cheery Merry Christmas, if you want to. Conversely,
since Christmas and Hanukkah often overlap, happy holidays is also
a nice phrase, taking in to account everything from Thanksgiving
through New Year’s Eve, but it’s a choice, not a mandate.
People are free to ignore
or embrace Christmas as they see fit. Even some Christians do not
celebrate Christmas in the traditional way, but that’s the
beauty of living in a country not ruled by one religion or the other.
I do not embrace the
use of the phrase African-American either. From my eyes, I see no
difference between Sammy Sosa, a black (really, a lovely brown)
man from Latin America and Muhammad Ali. You can’t refer to
both of these gentlemen as African-Americans.
It is absurd in general
to refer to people by their color. My skin color bears no resemblance
to my white T-shirts, and black people are not black either. They
really are varying shades of warm brown—black is an absence
of color. The effort to find labels that offend no one, offends
me in its absurdity. There is no need to refer to a person as Joe
Blow, a black man or Joe Below, a white man. What’s wrong
with just referring to them by name? Unless they are on the run
from the law, there is no need for a color identity.
Thinking about all this
makes my head hurt. This is the one time of year when people seriously
think about world peace, harmony within communities and ways to
make life better for those who cannot do it for themselves. If people
thought this way 365 days a year, we would eliminate many community
and world problems, but sadly it happens only once a year and for
far too short a time. Why is that? It seems most of the world embraces
the spirit of Christmas, whether they be Christian or not, but the
remaining 11 months of the year, it is dog-eat-dog business as usual.
I’d hate to think it all comes down to the economics of the
season, but it may well be that simple. Even discounting the huge
Moslem population, Christmas is a world celebration.
Every year I want the
spirit of the season to be eternal and it never is. Call me Pollyanna
if you want to, but I really believe world harmony can be achieved,
one person at a time.
May the joys and blessings
of the season be with you and yours.
More
from Leah
|